<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Evolving Software &#187; ubiquitous language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/tag/ubiquitous-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>General tidbits about Domain Driven Design and TrueView</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:21:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Eric Evans: &#8220;What I&#8217;ve learned about DDD since the book&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/06/30/eric-evans-what-ive-learned-about-ddd-since-the-book/</link>
		<comments>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/06/30/eric-evans-what-ive-learned-about-ddd-since-the-book/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 11:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Useful info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ddd]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain driven design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eric evans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[experimenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exploring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubiquitous language]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Eric Evans talks about the most essential parts of his book, having practiced it over the last 5 years.
One of the topics that caught my attention was Exploration and Experimentation (3m 25s into the video).  Evans suggests that teams should be exploring &#38; experimenting even after a useful domain model is created.  His quote:
What are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://domaindrivendesign.org/library/evans_2009_1">Eric Evans talks about</a> the most essential parts of his book, having practiced it over the last 5 years.</p>
<p>One of the topics that caught my attention was <strong>Exploration and Experimentation</strong> (3m 25s into the video).  Evans suggests that teams should be exploring &amp; experimenting even after a useful domain model is created.  His quote:</p>
<blockquote><p>What are the odds that [the first good model] is the best you could have done?</p></blockquote>
<p>So why aren&#8217;t teams doing this already?  Typically, it&#8217;s because of <strong>fear </strong>and <strong>cost of change</strong><em>. </em>Traditionally, software has never been easy to change (read <em>expensive</em>).  And for all of the new technology being spewed out, not all of it is designed to <em>make change easy</em>.</p>
<p>This is the void that <a href="http://www.evolving-software.co.uk/trueview-domain-modeller.html">TrueView </a>attempts to address.  It&#8217;s not about UI design, or database design, or Web Service contracts.  It&#8217;s about creating interactive domain models that Domain Experts and Software Experts can explore, discuss, and help refine the <strong>ubiquitous language</strong>.</p>
<p>If you haven&#8217;t tried it already, you can <a href="http://www.evolving-software.co.uk/downloads/TrueViewFreeTrial.exe">download it here</a>. I hope you find it useful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/06/30/eric-evans-what-ive-learned-about-ddd-since-the-book/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The reality of UI mock-ups and DDD</title>
		<link>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/03/19/the-reality-of-ui-mock-ups-and-ddd/</link>
		<comments>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/03/19/the-reality-of-ui-mock-ups-and-ddd/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:51:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vijay</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[TrueView tips]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Useful info]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mockup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[modelling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ubiquitous language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ui]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casey Charlton is writing a sample application using DDD.  His first step was to create a UI mock-up to reflect a user story  
&#8220;What&#8217;s so bad about that?&#8221; I hear you cry.  Well, here&#8217;s the problem:
UI prototyping is great for defining how a person is going to solve a business problem.  It&#8217;s not great [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Casey Charlton is writing a <a href="http://devlicio.us/blogs/casey/archive/2009/03/09/ddd-sample-application-first-steps.aspx">sample application</a> using DDD.  His first step was to create a UI mock-up to reflect a user story <img src='http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>&#8220;What&#8217;s so bad about that?&#8221; I hear you cry.  Well, here&#8217;s the problem:</p>
<p>UI prototyping is great for defining <strong><em>how </em></strong>a person is going to solve a business problem.  It&#8217;s not great at defining <strong><em>what </em></strong>the problem actually is (i.e. the business domain).</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen this happen many, many times:</p>
<ol>
<li>Developer sketches UI, to start discussions with the Domain Expert/Business Analyst</li>
<li>Business Analyst adds/removes/repositions some widgets</li>
<li>&#8216;Hand waving&#8217; and &#8216;pointing at imaginary boxes&#8217; becomes the communication technique of choice</li>
<li>Developer agrees to &#8216;quickly code up&#8217; an interactive prototype</li>
<li>End user wants a different shade of blue</li>
</ol>
<p>Although the Developer has good intentions of leveraging DDD, the urge to see working apps overrides everything else &#8211; leaving the Developer with a vague understanding of the business domain.</p>
<p>As the Developer <em>does </em>learn more about the domain, he usually finds that the original UI design is inadequate. And changing a UI is expensive (it&#8217;s a pity that most businesses don&#8217;t understand why).</p>
<p>This is where <a href="http://www.evolving-software.co.uk/downloads.html">TrueView</a> shines.  It automatically creates interactive UIs, but only based on domain definitions and relationships. Which means:</p>
<ul>
<li> The Business Analyst <strong>must</strong> describe the business domain.</li>
<li>The Developer <strong>must</strong><strong> </strong>start understanding the domain</li>
<li>Both <strong>must</strong><strong> </strong>define and share the <a href="http://domaindrivendesign.org/discussion/messageboardarchive/UbiquitousLanguage.html"><em>Ubiquitous Language</em></a>.</li>
</ul>
<p>TrueView doesn&#8217;t give you a <em>totally </em>customisable UI, but you <em>do </em>get an interactive prototype that <strong>models the business</strong>.  Once you understand the domain model, you&#8217;re in a perfect position to design a slick UI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://evolving-software.co.uk/blog/2009/03/19/the-reality-of-ui-mock-ups-and-ddd/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
